3. Producción

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    En defensa del “argumento maestro” de Berkeley
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2023-12-11)
    Berkley’s so-called “master argument”—through which he proves his principle esse est percipi—has been submitted to mixed criticisms by various commentators. Some defend its validity from the perspective of their own interpretations, while some claim that the argument is fallacious due to several objections. This article defends the master argument against three objections raised by Russell, Pitcher and Tipton. These could be respectively characterized as “the objection of the confusion of the perceptive act with the perceived object”, “the objection of the confusion of the concept of the object with the object itself”, and “the objection of the solipsism of the present”. I present my own reading of the master argument in order to avoid misunderstandings and claim that the correct understanding of this argument requires considering the following issues: the clarification of the Berkeleyan concepts of idea and perception; the explication of the intentionality of perception, understood as its intentional direction towards intentional objects (ideas); and the distinction between two levels of intentional direction of mediated experience (of an idea through another one)—that is, a level directed towards the concept or mental representation as its immediate intentional object, and another level directed towards the represented object as its mediated intentional object.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Percepción y temporalidad: Husserl frente a Heidegger
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-12-10)
    This contribution is part of a copious bibliographic tradition that has sought the points of encounter and disencounter between the two most relevant phenomenologists of the 20th century: Husserl and Heidegger. Starting from the critical foundations of the 1919 public emergence of Heidegger’s project of an originary science, I propose, first of all, to review his criticism of the history of philosophy, which, in his opinion, has committed the original sin of being theoretical. And along these lines, I also review how this theorization has been mainly seen in the absolutization of perception when describing the original relationship between human beings and the world. This critical thread, though not explicit, reaches into Husserl’s quarries. Faced with this, secondly, I attempt a possible response to said critique in light of Husserl’s discovery of the absolute flow of consciousness as found in his Lectures on the Internal Time Consciousness.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Cajas
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2012)
    Mario Montalbetti, poeta y lingüista, ha lanzado al espacio un nuevo artefacto: Cajas. En un formato que podría ser incorporado a cualquier catálogo de libros objeto, este volumen explora la relación entre el lenguaje y la dimensión espacial. Se trata a su vez de una indagación filosófica en torno al objeto, una incursión semiótica en el espacio —en el sentido de áreas y volúmenes. Pero sin duda, creemos que es una continuación de la búsqueda de Montalbetti en el campo del sentido, la poesía y el discurso. Una caja es un objeto tridimensional que distingue un dentro de un fuera, explica el autor; a su vez, refiere, hay diversos tipos de cajas, puede ser un sobre, un maletín, una casa. ¿Qué es lo que puede guardar, ocultar o resguardar una caja? ¿Es una foto una caja 2D? ¿Una botella, es una caja? Montalbetti da respuestas como deja interrogantes. Y así de misterioso es este libro, revelador, lúdico, divertido. Varias de las características que un proceso de aprendizaje debe mostrar.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    La recuperación del uso de morteros de cal. La situación en el Perú
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-12-16)
    Traditional materials have been part of our society across much of the world and, by extension, were also widely used in Peru up until the 20th century. The arrival of new materials such as cement and concrete has led to a sudden loss of the knowledge once held about traditional materials. However, in restoration and conservation processes of cultural buildings, understanding the characteristics and types of materials present in such structures is essential, both for their consolidation and reintegration. This requires not only the recovery of the material itself but, more importantly, the revival of traditional skills and the knowledge associated with them. Lime is no exception to this process and, unfortunately, the knowledge related to its use has also been lost. This article explores the use of lime as a traditional material and the importance of its recovery, not only due to its compatibility with traditional substrates but also because of its technical properties, which make it one of the most significant binding agents of both the past and the future.
      1