3. Producción

Browse

Settings

Language: search.filters.language.SpanishSubject: search.filters.subject.Evidence

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Practice-based evidence: bridging the gap between research and routine clinical practice in diverse settings
    (Taylor & Francis, 2022-09-02)
    This article is an introduction to this special issue dedicated to promoting the building of bridges between research and clinical practice. The purpose of this compendium is to delve into the relevance and possibilities that the Practice-Based Evidence (PBE) paradigm offers, which includes establishing a two-way dialogue between clinical practice and research, through the studies carried out by researchers from different countries and with different backgrounds, their approaches to the construction of knowledge from the ‘bottom up’ and the application of their findings to routine practice. PBE seeks to develop research whose findings are relevant for practitioners in routine clinical settings, from dissimilar countries and cultural contexts, where the central interest is improving the quality of treatment provided to users of mental health services.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    La deficiente regulación de la inspección judicial en el Código Procesal Civil peruano: Vacíos y propuestas de reforma
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-12-19)
    This research article focuses on the legal and normative analysis of judicial inspections in Peru, critically examining their current regulation. The study identifies and discusses the shortcomings and gaps in the legal provisions of the Peruvian Code of Civil Procedure and proposes solutions for future legislation. Structural problems are critically analyzed, particularly the lack of clear normative limits regarding dignity and bodily privacy, the absence of a specific procedure for judicial inspections in collegiate courts, the lack of provisions for the use of new technologies, such as drones, and the inspection of electronic documents. The methodology employs comparative law as a tool to support the need for legislative reform.