3. Producción
Browse
3 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, El proceso y la tutela de los derechos(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2019)Este libro, escrito por Giovanni Priori, plantea una revisión de las nociones tradicionales del derecho procesal, a partir del paradigma del Estado constitucional. Desde esta perspectiva, invita a revisar las instituciones procesales desde los derechos fundamentales y de la estrecha relación que debe existir entre el proceso y los derechos materiales.3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, La articulación entre el SIDH y la Constitución peruana de 1993: reglas restrictivas del Nuevo Código Procesal Constitucional(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-12-19)This text critically analyzes Peru’s new Constitutional Procedural Code in light of the standards of the Inter-American Human Rights System, particularly regarding effective judicial protection, due process, and the principle of conventionality control. Through a pluralistic dialogue among different doctrinal positions, it examines key reforms such as the transfer of jurisdiction over habeas corpus, the regulation of preliminary dismissals, the express omission of collective amparo proceedings, and the restrictions introduced on the use of Inter-American Court jurisprudence. The analysis highlights the tensions between the pursuit of procedural efficiency and the requirement to guarantee real, timely, and effective access to constitutional justice, in accordance with Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights.1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Apuntes constitucionales sobre el proceso especial de dictado de medidas de protección - Ley 30364(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-12-19)This article addresses the constitutional tensions inherent in the special procedure for issuing protection measures under Law 30364, particularly in relation to fundamental guarantees such as due process, the presumption of innocence, and the right to defense. It asserts that these guarantees are not violated but must be interpreted contextually, in light of the procedure’s urgent and preventive character. The analysis highlights the sui generis and urgent nature of the protective stage, its alignment with binding international human rights standards - most notably Convention on the Elimination of AllForms of Discrimination against Women and the Belém do Pará Convention– and the centrality of the reinforced due diligence standard in ensuring effective protection for victims of gender-based violence. It is argued that the principle of proportionality, when applied through a gender-sensitive lens, reconciles the imperative of immediate and effective victim protection with the preservation of the respondent’s fundamental rights, without eroding the protective function of the process. The article advances the proposal of applying a reinforced proportionality test to the constitutional review of protection measures. This test incorporates interpretative tools such as the in dubio pro victim principle and the due diligence standard specific to cases of violence against women, Chile safeguarding the essential core of procedural guarantees. Through this framework, the special procedure emerges as a constitutionally sound and necessary mechanism to address gender-based violence in accordance with both domestic constitutional principles and international human rights obligations.2
