3. Producción

Browse

Settings

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.Economic Justice

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Community-based justice or indigenous justice in international law: Analysis of Article 9 of ILO Convention 169
    (Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law, 2022-12-23)
    This paper deals with communal justice or indigenous justice governed by Convention No. 169 of the International Labour Organization (ILO). Article 9 of the indicated Convention is analysed describing and commenting on the different aspects or assumptions it contains about communal or indigenous justice. Likewise, this content is analysed in the doctrine and in the author’s field experience. The central question that guides the work is: How does the International Convention No. 169 of the International Labour Organization regulate communal or Indigenous justice? The answer is made through the verification of a hypothesis that raises the limits of the Article 9 of Convention 169 to understand and regulate communal or indigenous justice that is practiced in indigenous communities or peoples.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Judicial Efficiency in Times of Artificial Intelligence and Predictable Justice
    (Brill, 2025-11-19)
    The essay seeks to establish a theoretical connection between the ideal of judicial efficiency as one of the purposes of civil procedure linked to the best use of scarce resources available in all judicial proceedings. Aware that procedures involve the expenditure of effort, money, expectations, and time, this essay seeks to investigate the use of technological mechanisms, specifically, artificial intelligence at the supreme court level, to determine whether litigation or court proceedings could become more efficient with the use of artificial intelligence for certain tasks. Furthermore, remarks on technology and artificial intelligence ( ai ) shall be drafted to whether affirm or not if this new technology could enhance the production of precedents by means of deep learning, automatization and other legal analytic techniques by replication of cases. The essay concludes proposing specifical techniques or tasks an ai system could perform to enhance some jurisprudential functions of supreme courts, including selecting and producing precedents. To conclude, this contribution shall be represented by a computational model or scheme ( fig.1 ) to be considered and implemented in accordance with ai permitted tasks.
      1