3. Producción
Browse
3 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, ¿Caducidad o prescripción? De la reparación civil en los casos de sentencias derivadas de procesos penales por delitos contra la Administración Pública en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2019-05-27)This paper analyzes the debate that arose in the Peruvian legal system about whether the term that the State has to collect civil compensation in cases of judgments arising from criminal procedures for offenses against public administration is one of expiration or prescription. The difference is not minor because while the prescription period allows for interruptions, the expiration period is not interrupted even when the debtor performs dilatory maneuvers to avoid payment. This last situation is recurrent in the context of the prosecution of the crimes against the public administration, as they sanction state corruption. In this paper, we intend to contribute to the aforementioned debate based on the revision of the figure of civil compensation and its capacity to combat and prevent corruption. Also, the definition, scope and differences between the figures of the expiration and the prescription will be studied to indicate, on the end, that this last institution is the one applicable to the supposed matters of examination. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Due obedience for illegitimate orders: A case study of embezzlement in Ecuador and Colombia(Centro Latinoamericano de Administracion para el Desarrollo, 2022-07-01)This paper analyzes due obedience in the crime of embezzlement in two cases of Ecuadorian and Colombian jurisprudence, from the perspective of criminal law, public administration and social psychology. The qualitative approach and the multiple case study technique with three propositions are used. It is shown that the superior’s deviation when issuing an order entails an ethical and legal dilemma for the subordinate official, who must analyze the content of the order because his decision has criminal consequences that lead to embezzlement. It is concluded that the lack of questioning of the officials against the orders received from their superiors configures the presumption of legality in such orders or the implementation of a common criminal objective between the superior and the subordinate. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, El delito de tráfico de influencias en su modalidad real en el Código penal peruano: una crítica a su configuración típica(University of Deusto, 2026-06-24)Desde la doctrina penal se han desarrollado posturas a favor y en contra de incorporar como delito el tráfico de influencias en su modalidad real, debido a que el traficante y el comprador de influencias son particulares ajenos a la Administración, por lo que la conducta del primero no colocaría en peligro a su correcto funcionamiento. En ese contexto, en el trabajo se evalúa la compatibilidad de su estructura típica con la técnica de tipificación de peligro abstracto y con los principios limitadores del ius puniendi estatal, especialmente el de lesividad y el de mínima intervención. El análisis permite concluir que la sanción penal del tráfico de influencias resulta legítima siempre que se reformule el tipo penal y se exija como elemento objetivo la efectiva intercesión del sujeto activo ante el funcionario público. De esta manera, la conducta del traficante es ex ante idónea para crear un riesgo prohibido para el correcto funcionamiento de la Administración, particularmente en lo relativo a su imparcialidad. Recibido: 30 enero 2026Aceptado: 13 mayo 2026