3. Producción

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Ietza BojórquezHas files: No

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    The response of health systems to the needs of migrants and refugees in the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative case study between Mexico, Colombia and Peru
    (Elsevier Ltd, 2024-12-01)
    Protecting the health of migrants and refugees during the pandemic was a significant challenge in the Latin American region. We aimed to describe and contrast the response of the health systems of Mexico, Colombia and Perú to migrants' and refugees’ health needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to situate the response in the context of the migration and health policies of each country. Methods: We conducted case studies of the three countries. The data collected for each case included: 1) policy documents; 2) peer-reviewed and grey literature; 3) qualitative interviews with key informants. Findings: The three countries issued policies to detect COVID-19 cases among migrants and refugees, and granted them access to COVID-19 care regardless of their migration status or facilitated regularization as a way to improve access to care. However, other health care needs were not considered, some groups of migrants remained invisible in the policies, and policies rarely considered the increased social and economic vulnerability of migrants and refugees during this period. Pre-existing barriers to care were made worse during the pandemic. All three countries’ response to migrants was reliant on non-governmental organizations, with international cooperation being especially active in Colombia, and local civil society organizations in Mexico. Interpretation: The response of each country was a continuation of their previous approach to migration and health. Developing plans for pandemic response that consider migrants and refugees’ particular needs will be important to improve response capacities in the future. Funding: Funding was provided by USA for the International Organization for Migration (IOM) under an agreement with the Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    265 Migration and health research in turbulent times: navigating and strengthening evidence and politics, for improved evidence-based policy across regions
    (Oxford University Press, 2025-12-01)
    WKS 27: Impact of a changing political environment on research on migration and health in Europe and Latin America: Challenges and opportunities, B305 (FCSH), September 5, 2025, 09:00 - 10:00 Amidst rising political polarization and widespread funding cuts, migration and health research is increasingly constrained, with growing implications for evidence-informed policymaking. This round table convenes experts from the European and Latin American Regional Hubs of Lancet Migration, a global initiative launched following the 2018 UCL–Lancet Commission on Migration and Health and from WHO Health and Migration to reflect on how best to jointly respond to these challenges. The session aims to foster dialogue on how researchers can respond to today's complex geopolitical realities and safeguard the integrity and impact of migration health research. Guided by the WHO Research Agenda on health, migration and displacement and its implementation, the discussion will explore global, regional and national experiences and strategies for adapting to shifting priorities, and the role of research agenda setting in a constrained funding environment. Panellists will examine the role of researchers and policy makers in prioritising the topic of health and migration in politically unstable environments, the use of evidence and opportunities for translation by policymakers, and the ethical tensions surrounding objectivity and independence in research. This session underscores that evidence dissemination and translation into policy in migration and health is under threat. It calls for collective action by global academics and policy makers to anticipate and respond to evolving political and financial pressures to continue to prioritise this topic. By sharing cross-regional and global insights and strengthening networks, the round table seeks to equip researchers with tools to remain effective and resilient in their work—despite mounting external constraints.
      2