3. Producción
Browse
3 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Monitoreos hídricos comunitarios: conocimientos locales como defensa territorial y ambiental en Argentina, Perú y Colombia(Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador, 2020-12-10)En Latinoamérica, en el contexto de la expansión de proyectos de minería a gran escala y dadas sus consecuencias socioambientales y territoriales, se han implementado diversos monitoreos del agua (institucionales y empresariales) basados en conocimientos técnicos que desvalorizan otros conocimientos. Por lo tanto, han emergido los monitoreos hídricos comunitarios (MHC), una estrategia para posicionar las concepciones y los conocimientos locales como una herramienta política, con la que se visibiliza y cuestiona los efectos de la minería en el agua. De igual manera, las comunidades han establecido redes con la academia, las ONG y las organizaciones sociales, y así propiciar el diálogo entre sus conocimientos y los conocimientos técnicos, con el fin de generar contranarrativas frente a los indicadores e informes institucionales o empresariales sobre la calidad del agua, y como estrategia de defensa territorial frente a la minería. Nos centramos en la investigación realizada entre 2018 y 2020 en Argentina (Veladero), Perú (Antapaccay-Expansión Tintaya) y Colombia (Cerrejón), en donde las comunidades locales han desarrollado MHC, basados en la producción y sistematización de sus conocimientos en torno al agua. Analizamos las asimetrías del conocimiento en contextos de desigualdad socioambiental y planteamos la necesidad de una discusión amplia que incluya los conocimientos locales y, por tanto, formas diversas de comprender, conocer y relacionarse con el agua y lo territorial de manera integral. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Rights to water and water's rights: Plural water governances in mining contexts of Colombia and Peru(Elsevier B.V., 2022-01-01)In large-scale mining contexts and the consequent generation of socio-environmental inequalities related to access to water, indigenous peoples and peasant communities demand the recognition of other ways of understanding water. In these contexts of dispute, emerge what we call plural water governances , which position diverse relationships and infrastructures of control of water in mining contexts. Likewise, they demand the recognition of other notions of water and water's rights that transcend normative problems and extend to nature-society relations and include non-humans. We present a comparative analysis between large-scale mining areas in Colombia (La Guajira-Cerrejón) and Peru (Apurímac-Las Bambas) and the effects of the infrastructure that are implemented under a notion of water as a public resource. Processes that generate social inequalities, eliminate, or ignore ethnic and local rights, increase the capture of water in some sectors and generate scarcity that affects access, use, and decision-making in relation to water. This chapter is the result of the research carried out in the two areas in Colombia and Peru during 2018 and 2019, based on an ethnographic and collaborative work. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The commitment to infrastructure: Public investment and the reproduction of water scarcity in contexts of large mining in Peru and Colombia(Universidad Catolica del Norte, 2022-01-01)Public and private policies typically consider the construction of infrastructure the most appropriate response to the problems of water scarcity and water disputes. However, infrastructure in itself not always is the solution. In this context we have the following questions: What are the logics behind the construction and implementation of water infrastructure? Why water infrastructures are not alone a solution to water stress and scarcity? How does infrastructure construction reduce or deepen inequalities in access to water? This article answers these questions by arguing that water infrastructures respond to technical-political projects of territorial control and mining expansion located in areas of mining influence, rather than aiming to solve water access and supply problems. In doing so, they ended up deepening inequalities in local water access. This article compares infrastructures constructed in the context of large-scale mining projects in Espinar, Peru and La Guajira, Colombia. The information presented was collected following qualitative methods (semi-structured interviews and situated ethnographies). Likewise, the article systematizes secondary quantitative and qualitative data provided by government institutions related to water and mining, and the Environmental Impact Studies and web publications regarding the Tintaya-Antapaccay and Cerrejón mining projects.