3. Producción
Browse
6 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Koinōnía y Justicia. De la República al Parménides(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-03-28)The main reason why the developmental interpretation of the platonic Parmenides believes this dialogue constitutes a crisis in the development of Plato’s thought is the idea that the philosopher criticizes therein its Theory of Ideas of the middle period – Phaedo, Symposium, Republic. The theory supposedly criticized would conceive the Ideas as absolutely simple and isolated unities that, as such, would make impossible the fulfilment of their own function. This would only be possible by a new relational conception of the Ideas introduced in Parmenides and developed in Sophist. In contrast to some scholars who do not even mention certain passages in those dialogues (e.g. Cordero, 2014, 2016), I will show 1) that the notion of koinōnia is essential to the project of the Republic, since its central idea, the notion of justice, is unthinkable without the notion of koinōnia of the Ideas with each other; and 2) that Parmenides makes use of this notion of justice (150a) precisely in relation to the eidetical koinōnia (143a-b) and to the Idea conceived as a whole (ὅλον) “which has come to be one complete/perfect thing out of all its parts – ἐξ ἁπάντων ἓν τέλειον γεγονός” (157e1, ἓν ἐκ πολλῶν, 157c6, ἓν τέλειον μόρια ἔχον, 157e4). - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Community-based justice or indigenous justice in international law: Analysis of Article 9 of ILO Convention 169(Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law, 2022-12-23)This paper deals with communal justice or indigenous justice governed by Convention No. 169 of the International Labour Organization (ILO). Article 9 of the indicated Convention is analysed describing and commenting on the different aspects or assumptions it contains about communal or indigenous justice. Likewise, this content is analysed in the doctrine and in the author’s field experience. The central question that guides the work is: How does the International Convention No. 169 of the International Labour Organization regulate communal or Indigenous justice? The answer is made through the verification of a hypothesis that raises the limits of the Article 9 of Convention 169 to understand and regulate communal or indigenous justice that is practiced in indigenous communities or peoples. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Punishment and pardon: the use of international humanitarian law by the Special Jurisdiction for Peace in Colombia(Cambridge University Press, 2022-04-01)Transitional justice systems generally aim to achieve two goals. One is to bring the perpetrators of past atrocities to justice to ensure that they do not go unpunished, which involves the State fulfilling its duty to investigate, prosecute and punish serious human rights violations and breaches of international humanitarian law (IHL). The other is to bring about reconciliation to heal a divided society and achieve peace and stability. This normally requires the adoption of measures of clemency, such as granting amnesty, so that those who took part in the country's violent past can return to civilian life. The use of IHL is relevant in attaining both these goals because its complex nature means that it provides the legal basis for their implementation. However, this very complexity can mean that there are contradictions or complementarities between its characteristics. This article looks at the case of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) in Colombia, showing how this transitional jurisdiction has used IHL as a legal basis both for investigating, prosecuting and punishing serious violations committed during the Colombian armed conflict and for granting amnesty to those who took part in the hostilities. These different uses by the JEP demonstrate that IHL is a flexible tool that can facilitate the process of delivering both justice and peace after a conflict has ended. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The trail of Gyges. A secular philosophical controversy on the problem of corruption(Departamento de Literatura Espaà ±ola-Universidad de Sevilla, 2022-01-01)Utilizo el legendario relato sobre el anillo de Giges de la República de Platón para hacer una reflexión de mayor alcance sobre el modo en que se ha concebido en la historia de la filosofía el problema de la conducta humana corrupta: de sus motivaciones, sus presupuestos, sus consecuencias y también de las formas de combatirla. Me refiero a dos grandes tradiciones: en primer lugar, a la que llamo la tradición escéptica y estratégica, partidaria en líneas generales de la tesis de Glaucón, y, en segundo lugar, a la tradición opuesta, la defendida por Sócrates en el diálogo, y que podría considerarse, por contraste con la anterior, filantrópica y cívica. Concluyo con una reflexión ligada a nuestra época, apoyándome en las tesis de Richard Rorty en su último libro Forjar nuestro país - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Theory and Praxis at the Borders: the Disconnection between Political Philosophy and the Necropolitical Management of Migration(Spanish National Research Council, 2025-12-30)Este artículo examina la desconexión entre algunos de los debates filosóficos contemporáneos sobre migración y las prácticas reales de gestión fronteriza, centrando la atención en la distancia entre las discusiones normativas sobre justicia —como la apertura o cierre de fronteras y la membresía— y las dinámicas necropolíticas que operan en la gestión de la movilidad humana. Mediante un análisis bibliográfico y un enfoque deductivo, se argumenta que ciertas propuestas normativas no logran abordar adecuadamente las consecuencias materiales y humanas de las políticas migratorias en las fronteras. Se sostiene que, en la práctica, las fronteras funcionan como dispositivos necropolíticos que gestionan la vida y la muerte de los migrantes, más que como simples zonas de admisión o rechazo sugeridas por ciertas teorías filosóficas.2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Justice, Koinonia and Unity: Phaedo, Republic and Parmenides(Coimbra University Press, 2026-06-11)Thus far, scholarly research has paid little attention to the relationship between justice, koinonia and unity in Plato's works. This is despite the fact that this relationship is already mentioned in Gorgias 507e6–508a3–even though the passage makes no reference to the theory of forms. In what follows, I will attempt to demonstrate how this relationship is established in the realm of forms. First, I examine the so-called intellectual biography of the philosopher in the Phaedo (95e–102a). This passage introduces community (????????) and presence (????????) as alternative ways to understand how things participate in forms. However, by the end of the dialogue the exact nature of this kind of participation remains unclear (100d5–6). Nevertheless, the Phaedo's discussion of previous views on the cause of being, generation, and destruction suggests a single teleological cause that connects and holds everything together (99c5–6). Secondly, I demonstrate that the relationship between koinonia and justice within the realm of forms is fundamental to Plato's Republic, even though this relationship is considered just as a paradigm (500c–501e) and therefore not explicitly discussed. Thirdly, I demonstrate that the Republic's concept of justice is employed in the Parmenides to clarify the function and structure of the forms. This model of justice enables us to favour the conception of participation as koinonia, thereby rejecting the so-called model of immanence, namely, the view that forms are present in that which participates in them. Finally, I illustrate how the model of justice, present in the third deduction of Parmenides II (157b–159b), contributes to the exploration of the koinonia between the One and the principle of plurality.