3. Producción
Browse
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Predictive Model of Ambivalent Sexism in People who Do and Do Not Practice Theatrical Improvisation(Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2025-02-06)¿Puede la práctica de improvisación teatral contribuir en la reducción del sexismo? Investigaciones previas sobre el prejuicio han sugerido que las diferencias individuales tienen un rol en su predicción (Hodson & Dhont, 2015; Sibley & Duckitt, 2008). Específicamente, sobre el prejuicio sexista, se ha encontrado que la práctica de ciertas artes escénicas puede contribuir a disminuirlo (Christensen, 2013). Sin embargo, escasas investigaciones han estudiado qué variables intervienen en tal descenso y el rol de diferencias individuales al respecto. El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo probar un modelo correlacional-predictivo del sexismo ambivalente, integrando la práctica de la improvisación teatral (sí/no), rigidez cognitiva, autoritarismo, orientación a la dominancia, empatía y sexo. Los participantes fueron 204 jóvenes adultos de Lima, Perú, de los cuales el 51% practicaba la improvisación teatral y el 49% eran mujeres. Los resultados de un análisis de senderos realizado indican que las variables investigadas pueden integrarse en un modelo estadístico de buen ajuste (?²/gl = 1,71, CFI = 0,97; IFI = 0,97; RMSEA = 0,059; SRMR = 0,04), que plantea predictores y rutas específicas para cada tipo de sexismo ambivalente, basándose en una integración de las teorías tres grandes, modelo cognitivo-motivacional de proceso dual, conservadurismo como cognición social motivada y modelo afecto-cognición. Se muestra que el autoritarismo impacta en el sexismo, y que la práctica de improvisación tiene un efecto pequeño sobre la rigidez cognitiva y sexismo benevolente. La práctica de improvisación es una herramienta limitada pero potencialmente útil para reducir prejuicios sexistas si es parte de una intervención.1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Predictive Indicators of Psychological Inflexibility in Women Engaged in High-Risk Romantic Relationships(2025-01-01)Objective: This study aimed to identify the core psychological patterns and experiential indicators that predict psychological inflexibility in women involved in high-risk romantic relationships. Methods and Materials: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 20 women from Kenya who were currently or recently engaged in romantic relationships characterized by emotional, psychological, or physical risk. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, and interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was reached. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis in NVivo 14 software, following Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach. The trustworthiness of the analysis was ensured through member checking, peer debriefing, and an audit trail. Findings: Thematic analysis revealed four overarching categories reflecting the predictive indicators of psychological inflexibility: (1) Cognitive Rigidity and Maladaptive Beliefs, including overgeneralization, black-and-white thinking, and fatalistic worldviews; (2) Emotional Dysregulation and Experiential Avoidance, such as emotional suppression, fear of expression, and numbing; (3) Relational Dependency and Identity Diffusion, marked by fused identities, fear of abandonment, and lack of assertiveness; and (4) Trauma History and Psychological Vulnerability, including unresolved childhood trauma, repetition of abusive patterns, and hypervigilance in intimacy. Participants' narratives revealed how these patterns sustained psychological inflexibility and impaired their ability to exit or reframe harmful relationships. Conclusion: Psychological inflexibility in women engaged in high-risk romantic relationships is shaped by a convergence of cognitive rigidity, emotional avoidance, relational enmeshment, and unresolved trauma.2