3. Producción
Browse
3 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Co-production outcomes for urban equality: Learning from different trajectories of citizens' involvement in urban change(Elsevier B.V., 2022-01-01)The involvement of citizens and communities in processes that affect their lives and livelihoods through co-production methods has gained currency in recent years as a method to deliver place-based action capable of advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. Co-production represents a promising approach that addresses criticisms leveraged against community-oriented and participatory planning approaches. In this paper, we investigate the potential of co-production methods to advance different dimensions of urban equality in urban environments, including progress towards equitable distribution of resources and services, the reciprocal recognition of communities and institutions, the access to political and decision-making processes, and the recognition of multiple forms of knowledge and perspectives. First, the paper reviews what is unique about co-production as a method in urban development planning. Co-production is distinct because it focuses on delivering a shared outcome. In doing so, it challenges epistemic injustices. Second, the paper presents a collective assessment of the outcomes of co-production practices in six different cities. The comparative analysis of these experiences shows that multiple co-production practices can help to establish long-term, adaptable partnerships to deliver urban equality. However, such a process requires constant adjustment and trade-offs to achieve equality gains in different domains. For that reason, the transformative impacts of co-production are not always measurable, even when its role in social change is evident. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Building Common Understandings of Urban Inequalities to Generate Relevant Solutions in Lima, Peru(SAGE Publishing, 2023-01-06)In this article, we analyse the structural causes of inequality in Lima – beginning with a review of the historical context – to propose a multidimensional approach to urban inequality. We discuss spatial, public-institutional and political-social fragmentation and how these factors contribute to the reproduction of urban inequality. We supplement this discussion by describing two initiatives that contributed to the creation of a collective understanding of inequality and strategies to deal with it. First, we worked with marginalized social groups promoting collective care practices to address food insecurity resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Along with this, we developed a National Housing and Urban Planning Policy with the Peruvian Ministry of Housing, Construction and Sanitation that included a definition of urban inequality and the creation of an index for urban inequality. In each case, we discuss the difficulties faced, whether by citizens or the state, in trying to reach relevant solutions to address inequalities. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Co-production of Recommendations to Improve Mental Health Services for Youth in Peru: Analysis of Workshops with Professionals and Service Users(Elsevier BV, 2025-10-01)Objective Co-produce recommendations with professionals and users to improve mental health services for young people and adolescents in Lima, Peru. Methods We conducted 4 co-production workshops with 30 users and health professionals from 2 primary health care centres and 3 Community Mental Health Centres located in Lima, Peru. Their recommendations were organised into four categories: centres’ resources, health personnel, challenges in care access and continuity, guidelines and health service packages. A final list was compiled by identifying commonalities between suggestions. Results The recommendations included guaranteeing users’ privacy during sessions, training the staff to deliver efficient and empathetic care, promoting and disseminating mental health services options, and prioritising treatment adherence. While professionals suggested changes related to the administrative aspects of health facilities, users recommended improvements in the interpersonal treatment received during care. Conclusion Engaging both users and professionals allows for the identification of valuable recommendations to improve access to and the quality of mental health services for young people. Future efforts should focus on developing sustainable strategies to address the needs of key stakeholders.1